What is a potential risk associated with the realist approach to military ethics?

The realist approach to military ethics emphasizes state interests and power dynamics over moral considerations, which can lead to justifying actions that disregard ethical principles. This perspective often prioritizes pragmatic outcomes, such as military success or national security, potentially at the expense of humanitarian concerns and the moral implications of warfare. By rationalizing the use of force without a thorough consideration of ethical standards, actions may be taken that could harm civilians or violate human rights, as the primary focus shifts to efficacy rather than ethical responsibility. Thus, the realist approach can create a dangerous environment where ethical lines become blurred or altogether ignored, leading to consequences that undermine both military integrity and broader societal values.